On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 09:34:36AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 09:10:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Commit dde67eb1beeb ("i2c: add i2c_get_device_id() to get the standard > > I2C device id") added a function to return the standard I2C device ID. > > Use that function to verify the device ID of a given device. > > I am very open to these patches, just... > > > > > Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > RFC: > > - Compile tested only > > ... I would really like to have them tested. After that happened, Peter > and I can figure out who should apply them for seamless upstreaming. > Patch 2/2 was for real HW. I don't have access to such HW right now. Guess we'll have to wait until someone does, unless Adrian is willing to test it. > > - Should there also be I2C_DEVICE_PART_ID_ANY to enable maching > > against all parts from a given manufacturer ? > > Can't we just add it when we need it? > Perfectly fine with me. > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "unexpected device id %03x-%03x-%x\n", > > + real_id.manufacturer_id, real_id.part_id, > > + real_id.die_revision); > > + return -ENODEV; > > I wonder about the ERR loglevel. ENODEV is not an error, I'd think? > 2d74187d5b4e, where this is derived from, uses dev_warn() instead, so that may be a better choice. Thanks, Guenter > Regards, > > Wolfram >