Hi Wolfram. On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:33:08 +0200 Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Boris, > > > Here are three patches preparing things for I3C (those changes were > > previously part of the I3C patchset) > > Thanks for this break out. I like it. > > > As you suggested I have split my original patch a bit and rebased the > > series on i2c/for-next. You might want to wait for an official > > green-light on the I3C proposal before applying patch 3 (I export a > > function whose only user is the I3C framework), but patch 1 and 2 can > > be applied now if you're okay with their content. > > Is for-4.18 good enough for a smooth I3C acceptance? Sure. I'll just merge your immutable branch into mine if things are accepted in the same release cycle. Thanks, Boris
