Hello Wolfram, On 11/05/2017 10:53 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 12:49:48PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices >> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a >> I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and >> that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>. >> >> But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an >> OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF. >> >> To maintain backward compatibility with old Device Trees, only use the OF >> device ID table .data if the device was registered via OF and the OF node >> compatible matches an entry in the OF device ID table. >> >> Suggested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Applied to for-next, thanks for keeping at it! > Great, thanks a lot for your feedback and suggestions on this series. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement Red Hat
