Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2017, 18:03:53 CET schrieb cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > From: Chen Liang <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The rk3328 i2c is the same as rk3399 > > Signed-off-by: Chen Liang <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt index bbc5a1e..abfdefd > 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Required properties : > - "rockchip,rk3228-i2c": for rk3228 > - "rockchip,rk3288-i2c": for rk3288 > - "rockchip,rk3399-i2c": for rk3399 > + - "rockchip,rk3328-i2c", "rockchip,rk3399-i2c": for rk3328 > - interrupts : interrupt number > - clocks: See ../clock/clock-bindings.txt > - For older hardware (rk3066, rk3188, rk3228, rk3288): same as before, not sure how people see that, but maybe place rk3328 before rk3399. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
