Linus, > You added an extra revert, only to pull in the *exact* same patch. WTF? The patch I reverted had a broken, typoed Signed-off. My rationale was to have only a proper one, and not two different ones coming from different trees. Looks like I misjudged, sorry. > Please stop this kind of stupidity. Now I have that unnecessary revert > with a misleading commit log in my tree, in addition to that stupid > merge that has no explanation and just reinstates the exact same thing > you reverted. I see your point. > And talking about that merge I will repeat this one more time: merges > are commits too. You had damn well add explanations for what a merge > merges and why it is done. Understood. Peter joined as co-maintainer kind of recently, and I guess it shows that I didn't have to pass on merges a lot so far. It is not that I ignored your preferences for merges (which make total sense to me), I just missed to check how to properly do it. Will improve! Regards, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
