On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:41:01AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> We should not leave i2c_register_board_info() early, without unlocking the
> __i2c_board_lock.
>
> Fixes: b0c1e95ab44f ("i2c: copy device properties when using ...")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
So, it seems that patches 1+2 are related. Because I'd like to have
patch 2 sitting in for-next for a whole cycle for sure, my plan is to
revert the faulty b0c1e95ab44f from for-current and apply the fixed
version (b0c1e95ab44f + this patch squashed) to for-next as well.
Is that okay with you?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
