It is better to revert the 63d0f0a6952a. -----Original Message----- From: Jarkko Nikula [mailto:jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 4:19 PM To: Suthikulpanit, Suravee <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>; De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>; mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@xxxxxxx> Cc: wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; S-k, Shyam-sundar <Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix regression when dynamic TAR update is disabled On 10.02.2017 08:38, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > At this points, my understanding is there are probably two options here: > > 1) Keep the commit 63d0f0a6952a (i2c: designware: detect when dynamic > tar update > is possible) and apply V2 of this patch in 4.10. We might need to > back-port the change > to v4.9 stable as well. > > 2) Revert the 63d0f0a6952a (i2c: designware: detect when dynamic tar > update is possible) in 4.10, > and also in v4.9 stable as well. > I'm fine with both options. Maybe revert as commit 0317e6c0f1dc ("i2c: designware: do not disable adapter after transfer") was also reverted and this revert doesn't seem to cause conflicts. -- Jarkko ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��-��)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
