2017-01-11 16:39 GMT+01:00 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 02:58:44PM +0100, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote:
>> Hi Uwe,
>>
>> 2017-01-11 9:22 GMT+01:00 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > Hello Cedric,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:07:23AM +0100, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote:
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * In standard mode:
>> >> + * SCL period = SCL high period = SCL low period = CCR * I2C parent clk period
>> >> + *
>> >> + * In fast mode:
>> >> + * If Duty = 0; SCL high period = 1 * CCR * I2C parent clk period
> ^^
>> >> + * SCL low period = 2 * CCR * I2C parent clk period
> ^^
>> >> + * If Duty = 1; SCL high period = 9 * CCR * I2C parent clk period
> ^^
>> >> + * SCL low period = 16 * CCR * I2C parent clk period
>
>> > s/ \*/ */ several times
>>
>> Sorry but I don't see where is the issue as the style for multi-line
>> comments seems ok.
>> Could you please clarify that point if possible ? Thanks in advance
>
> There are several places with double spaces before * marked above.
Ok I see thanks.
>
>> >> + * In order to reach 400 kHz with lower I2C parent clk frequencies we always set
>> >> + * Duty = 1
>> >> + *
>> >> + * For both modes, we have CCR = SCL period * I2C parent clk frequency
>> >> + * with scl_period = 5 microseconds in Standard mode and scl_period = 1
>> > s/mode/Mode/
>>
>> ok thanks
>>
>> >
>> >> + * microsecond in Fast Mode in order to satisfy scl_high and scl_low periods
>> >> + * constraints defined by i2c bus specification
>> >
>> > I don't understand scl_period = 1 µs for Fast Mode. For a bus freqency
>> > of 400 kHz we need low + high = 2.5 µs. Is there a factor 10 missing
>> > somewhere?
>>
>> As CCR = SCL_period * I2C parent clk frequency with minimal freq =
>> 2Mhz and SCL_period = 1 we have:
>> CCR = 1 * 2Mhz = 2.
>> But to compute, scl_low and scl_high in Fast mode, we have to do the
>> following thing as Duty=1:
>> scl_high = 9 * CCR * I2C parent clk period
>> scl_low = 16 * CCR * I2C parent clk period
>> In our example:
>> scl_high = 9 * 2 * 0,0000005 = 0,000009 sec = 9 µs
>> scl_low = 16 * 2 * 0.0000005 = 0,000016 sec = 16 µs
>> So low + high = 27 µs > 2,5 µs
>
> For me 9 µs + 16 µs is 25 µs, resulting in 40 kHz. That's why I wondered
> if there is a factor 10 missing somewhere.
Hum ok. I am going to double-check what is wrong because when I check
with the scope I always reach 400Khz for SCL.
I will let you know.
>
>> >> + */
>> >> +static struct stm32f4_i2c_timings i2c_timings[] = {
>> >> [...]
>> >> +
>> >> +/**
>> >> + * stm32f4_i2c_hw_config() - Prepare I2C block
>> >> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> >> + */
>> >> +static int stm32f4_i2c_hw_config(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> >> + int ret = 0;
>> >> +
>> >> + /* Disable I2C */
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_PE);
>> >> +
>> >> + ret = stm32f4_i2c_set_periph_clk_freq(i2c_dev);
>> >> + if (ret)
>> >> + return ret;
>> >> +
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_rise_time(i2c_dev);
>> >> +
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_speed_mode(i2c_dev);
>> >> +
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_filter(i2c_dev);
>> >> +
>> >> + /* Enable I2C */
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_PE);
>> >
>> > This function is called after a hw reset, so there should be no need to
>> > use clr_bits and set_bits because the value read from hw should be
>> > known.
>>
>> ok thanks
>>
>> >
>> >> + return ret;
>> >
>> > return 0;
>>
>> ok thanks
>>
>> >
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int stm32f4_i2c_wait_free_bus(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + u32 status;
>> >> + int ret;
>> >> +
>> >> + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR2,
>> >> + status,
>> >> + !(status & STM32F4_I2C_SR2_BUSY),
>> >> + 10, 1000);
>> >> + if (ret) {
>> >> + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "bus not free\n");
>> >> + ret = -EBUSY;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + return ret;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/**
>> >> + * stm32f4_i2c_write_ byte() - Write a byte in the data register
>> >> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> >> + * @byte: Data to write in the register
>> >> + */
>> >> +static void stm32f4_i2c_write_byte(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u8 byte)
>> >> +{
>> >> + writel_relaxed(byte, i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_DR);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/**
>> >> + * stm32f4_i2c_write_msg() - Fill the data register in write mode
>> >> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> >> + *
>> >> + * This function fills the data register with I2C transfer buffer
>> >> + */
>> >> +static void stm32f4_i2c_write_msg(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> >> +
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_write_byte(i2c_dev, *msg->buf++);
>> >> + msg->count--;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> >> + u32 rbuf;
>> >> +
>> >> + rbuf = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_DR);
>> >> + *msg->buf++ = rbuf & 0xff;
>> >
>> > This is unnecessary. buf has an 8 bit wide type so
>> >
>> > *msg->buf++ = rbuf;
>> >
>> > has the same effect. (ISTR this is something I already pointed out
>> > earlier?)
>>
>> Yes you are right.
>>
>> >
>> >> + msg->count--;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void stm32f4_i2c_terminate_xfer(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> >> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
>> >> +
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_disable_irq(i2c_dev);
>> >> +
>> >> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> >> + if (msg->stop)
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_STOP);
>> >> + else
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
>> >> +
>> >> + complete(&i2c_dev->complete);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/**
>> >> + * stm32f4_i2c_handle_write() - Handle FIFO empty interrupt in case of write
>> >> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> >> + */
>> >> +static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_write(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> >> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (msg->count) {
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_write_msg(i2c_dev);
>> >> + if (!msg->count) {
>> >> + /* Disable buffer interrupts for RXNE/TXE events */
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITBUFEN);
>> >> + }
>> >> + } else {
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_terminate_xfer(i2c_dev);
>> >
>> > Is stm32f4_i2c_terminate_xfer also called when arbitration is lost? If
>> > yes, is it then right to set STM32F4_I2C_CR1_STOP or
>> > STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START?
>>
>> If arbitration is lost, stm32f4_i2c_terminate_xfer() is not called.
>> In that case, we return -EAGAIN and i2c-core will retry by calling
>> stm32f4_i2c_xfer()
>>
>> >
>> >> + }
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/**
>> >> + * stm32f4_i2c_handle_read() - Handle FIFO empty interrupt in case of read
>> >> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> >> + */
>> >> +static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_read(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> >> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
>> >> +
>> >> + switch (msg->count) {
>> >> + case 1:
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_disable_irq(i2c_dev);
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
>> >> + complete(&i2c_dev->complete);
>> >> + break;
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * For 2 or 3-byte reception, we do not have to read the data register
>> >> + * when RXNE occurs as we have to wait for byte transferred finished
>> >
>> > it's hard to understand because if you don't know the hardware the
>> > meaning of RXNE is unknown.
>>
>> Ok I will replace RXNE by RX not empty in that comment
>>
>> >
>> >> + * event before reading data. So, here we just disable buffer
>> >> + * interrupt in order to avoid another system preemption due to RXNE
>> >> + * event
>> >> + */
>> >> + case 2:
>> >> + case 3:
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITBUFEN);
>> >> + break;
>> >> + /* For N byte reception with N > 3 we directly read data register */
>> >> + default:
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
>> >> + }
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/**
>> >> + * stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_btf() - Handle byte transfer finished interrupt
>> >> + * in case of read
>> >> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> >> + */
>> >> +static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_btf(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> >> +{
>> >
>> > btf is a hw-related name. Maybe better use _done which is easier to
>> > understand?
>>
>> OK
>>
>> >
>> >> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> >> + void __iomem *reg;
>> >> + u32 mask;
>> >> + int i;
>> >> +
>> >> + switch (msg->count) {
>> >> + case 2:
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * In order to correctly send the Stop or Repeated Start
>> >> + * condition on the I2C bus, the STOP/START bit has to be set
>> >> + * before reading the last two bytes.
>> >> + * After that, we could read the last two bytes, disable
>> >> + * remaining interrupts and notify the end of xfer to the
>> >> + * client
>> >
>> > This is surprising. I didn't recheck the manual, but that looks very
>> > uncomfortable.
>>
>> I agree but this exactly the hardware way of working described in the
>> reference manual.
>
> IMHO that's a hw bug. This makes it for example impossible to implement
> SMBus block transfers (I think).
This is not correct.
Setting STOP/START bit does not mean the the pulse will be sent right now.
Here we have just to prepare the hardware for the 2 next pulse but the
STOP/START/ACK pulse will be generated at the right time as required
by I2C specification.
So SMBus block transfer will be possible.
>
>> > How does this work, when I only want to read a single
>> > byte? Same problem for ACK below.
>>
>> For a single reception, we enable NACK and STOP or Repeatead START
>> bits during address match.
>> The NACK and STOP/START pulses are sent as soon as the data is
>> received in the shift register.
>> Please note that in that case, we don't have to wait BTF event to read the data.
>> Data is read as soon as RXNE event occurs.
>>
>> >
>> >> + */
>> >> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> >> + if (msg->stop)
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_STOP);
>> >> + else
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
>> >> +
>> >> + for (i = 2; i > 0; i--)
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
>> >> +
>> >> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
>> >> + mask = STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITEVTEN | STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITERREN;
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, mask);
>> >> +
>> >> + complete(&i2c_dev->complete);
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case 3:
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * In order to correctly send the ACK on the I2C bus for the
>> >> + * last two bytes, we have to set ACK bit before reading the
>> >> + * third last data byte
>> >> + */
>> >> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_ACK);
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
>> >> + break;
>> >> + default:
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
>> >> + }
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/**
>> >> + * stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_addr() - Handle address matched interrupt in case of
>> >> + * master receiver
>> >> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> >> + */
>> >> +static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_addr(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> >> + void __iomem *reg;
>> >> +
>> >> + switch (msg->count) {
>> >> + case 0:
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_terminate_xfer(i2c_dev);
>> >> + /* Clear ADDR flag */
>> >> + readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR2);
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case 1:
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * Single byte reception:
>> >
>> > This also happens for the last byte of a 5 byte transfer, right?
>>
>> For a 5 byte transfer the behavior is different:
>> We have to read data from DR (data register) as soon as the RXNE (RX
>> not empty) event occurs for data1, data2 and data3 (until N-2 data for
>> a more generic case)
>> The ACK is automatically sent as soon as the data is received in the
>> shift register as the I2C controller was configured to do that during
>> adress match phase.
>>
>> For data3 (N-2 data), we wait for BTF (Byte Transfer finished) event
>> in order to set NACK before reading DR.
>> This event occurs when a new data has been received in shift register
>> (in our case data4 or N-1 data) but the prevoius data in DR (in our
>> case data3 or N-2 data) has not been read yet.
>> In that way, the NACK pulse will be correctly generated after the last
>> received data byte.
>>
>> For data4 and data5, we wait for BTF event (data4 or N-1 data in DR
>> and data5 or N data in shift register), set STOP or repeated Start in
>> order to correctly sent the right pulse after the last received data
>> byte and run 2 consecutives read of DR.
>
> So "Single byte reception" above is wrong, as this case is also used for
> longer transfers and should be updated accordingly.
I don't think so.
stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_addr() is called once during adress match phase.
It is used to configure the I2C controller according to the number of
data to be received as it has to be done in a different way according
to the number of data to received:
- single byte reception
- 2-byte reception
- N-byte reception
Then, as soon as, the controller is correctly configured, for each
byte to be received, we use stm32f4_i2c_handle_read() or
stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_done().
stm32f4_i2c_handle_read() is used to read data for a single byte
reception or until N-2 data for N-byte reception
stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_done() is used to read data for a 2-byte
reception, or data N-2, N-1 and N for a N-byte reception.
So, single-reception and longer transfer have been clearly managed in
a different way.
>
>> >> + * Enable NACK, clear ADDR flag and generate STOP or RepSTART
>> >> + */
>> >> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_ACK);
>> >> + readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR2);
>> >> + if (msg->stop)
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_STOP);
>> >> + else
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case 2:
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * 2-byte reception:
>> >> + * Enable NACK and set POS
>> >
>> > What is POS?
>> POS is used to define the position of the (N)ACK pulse
>> 0: ACK is generated when the current is being received in the shift register
>> 1: ACK is generated when the next byte which will be received in the
>> shift register (used for 2-byte reception)
>
> Can you please put this into the comment. "POS" isn't much helpful
> there.
Ok I will add a comment for that.
>
>>
>> >
>> >> + */
>> >> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_ACK);
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_POS);
>> >
>> > You could get rid of this, when caching the value of CR1. Would save two
>> > register reads here. This doesn't work for all registers, but it should
>> > be possible to apply for most of them, maybe enough to get rid of the
>> > clr_bits and set_bits function.
>> >
>> >> + readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR2);
>> >> + break;
>> >> +
>> >> + default:
>> >> + /* N-byte reception: Enable ACK */
>> >> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> >> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_ACK);
>> >
>> > Do you need to set ACK for each byte transferred?
>> I need to do that in order to be SMBus compatible and the ACK/NACK
>> seems to be used by default in Documentation/i2c/i2c-protocol file.
>
> Yeah, protocol wise you need to ack each byte. I just wondered if you
> need to set the hardware bit for each byte or if it is retained in
> hardware until unset by a register write.
ACK bit is set in stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_addr().
As explained above, this function is called once during address match phase.
So, this bit is set only once just before receiving the first data byte.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Best regards,
Cedric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
