Hi,
On 12-12-16 11:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 23:43 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On my cherrytrail tablet with axp288 pmic, just doing a bunch of
repeated
reads from the pmic, e.g. "i2cdump -y 14 0x34" would lookup the tablet
in
1 - 3 runs guaranteed.
This seems to be causes by the cpu trying to enter C6 or C7 while we
hold
the punit bus semaphore, at which point everything just hangs.
Avoid this by the CPU to enter C6 or C7 before acquiring the punit bus
semaphore.
Please, keep Len Brown in a loop for this patch. And perhaps someone
from our Graphics team. Maybe Imre Deak?
See my comments below.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109051
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
-New patch in v2 of this set
Changes in v3:
-Change commit message and comment in the code from "force the CPU to
C1"
to "Disallow the CPU to enter C6 or C7", as the CPU may still be in
either
C0 or C1 with the request pm_qos
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c | 12 ++++++++++++
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 3 +++
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
index cf02222..997d048 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/i2c.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
@@ -33,6 +34,13 @@ static int get_sem(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, u32
*sem)
u32 data;
int ret;
+ /*
+ * Disallow the CPU to enter C6 or C7 state, entering these
states
+ * requires the punit to talk to the pmic and if this happens
while
+ * we're holding the semaphore, the SoC hangs.
+ */
+ pm_qos_update_request(&dev->pm_qos, 0);
+
ret = iosf_mbi_read(BT_MBI_UNIT_PMC, MBI_REG_READ,
PUNIT_SEMAPHORE, &data);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev->dev, "iosf failed to read punit
semaphore\n");
@@ -56,6 +64,8 @@ static void reset_semaphore(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
data &= ~PUNIT_SEMAPHORE_BIT;
if (iosf_mbi_write(BT_MBI_UNIT_PMC, MBI_REG_WRITE,
PUNIT_SEMAPHORE, data))
dev_err(dev->dev, "iosf failed to reset punit
semaphore during write\n");
+
+ pm_qos_update_request(&dev->pm_qos, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
}
static int baytrail_i2c_acquire(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
@@ -145,6 +155,8 @@ int i2c_dw_eval_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev
*dev)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
dev_info(dev->dev, "I2C bus managed by PUNIT\n");
+ pm_qos_add_request(&dev->pm_qos, PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY,
+ PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
Perhaps move this to the end of the function? For sake of readability.
Done.
dev->acquire_lock = baytrail_i2c_acquire;
dev->release_lock = baytrail_i2c_release;
dev->pm_runtime_disabled = true;
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
index fb143f5..47d284c 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
*
*/
+#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#define DW_IC_CON_MASTER 0x1
#define DW_IC_CON_SPEED_STD 0x2
@@ -67,6 +68,7 @@
* @fp_lcnt: fast plus LCNT value
* @hs_hcnt: high speed HCNT value
* @hs_lcnt: high speed LCNT value
+ * @pm_qos: pm_qos_request used while holding a hardware lock on the
bus
* @acquire_lock: function to acquire a hardware lock on the bus
* @release_lock: function to release a hardware lock on the bus
* @pm_runtime_disabled: true if pm runtime is disabled
@@ -114,6 +116,7 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
u16 fp_lcnt;
u16 hs_hcnt;
u16 hs_lcnt;
+ struct pm_qos_request pm_qos;
int (*acquire_lock)(struct dw_i2c_dev
*dev);
void (*release_lock)(struct dw_i2c_dev
*dev);
bool pm_runtime_disabled;
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
index 97a2ca1..6d72929 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
@@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_remove(struct
platform_device *pdev)
if (!dev->pm_runtime_disabled)
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+ if (dev->acquire_lock)
+ pm_qos_remove_request(&dev->pm_qos);
+
I read your answer to v2 of this, so, taking into consideration your
notice I would recommend to provide an additional helper like
i2c_dw_down_lock_support() (I didn't find proper antonym for eval, feel
free to choose a better name) and collect the above there.
Done for v4, will send v4 soon.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
