O> > > Suggested-by: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I know this is only a Suggested-by and not a Signed-off-by, but still I > > believe the Developer's Certificate of Origin applies, and it says: > > "using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous > > contributions.)" > > I asked him what he prefers - but no response. I didn't see that question but "Alan Cox" is probably saner - the thousand gnomes is an old Linus joke 8) > > i2c-piix4.c:module_param (force, int, 0); > > i2c-sis630.c:module_param(force, bool, 0); > > i2c-viapro.c:module_param(force, bool, 0); > > I don't know either. One could argue it *should* be locked down because its > need appears to reflect a BIOS bug. And none of those should show up in that usage form on a box new enough to have EFI secure boot. Those that do have i2c busses will report them via ACPI by that period. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
