Hi,
Thanks for your patch!
Some small suggestions inline.
On 2016-11-18 16:01, tnhuynh@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@xxxxxxx>
>
> This patch enable ACPI support for mux-pca954x driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> index 1091346..e7ef93b 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #include <linux/i2c/pca954x.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
Please keep the includes sorted.
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -120,6 +121,19 @@ struct pca954x {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pca954x_id);
>
> +static const struct acpi_device_id pca954x_acpi_ids[] = {
> + { "PCA9540", pca_9540 },
I would write that as:
{ .id = "PCA9540", .driver_data = pca_9540, },
But that doesn't seem common for other acpi_device_id tables.
I wonder why?
> + { "PCA9542", pca_9540 },
> + { "PCA9543", pca_9543 },
> + { "PCA9544", pca_9544 },
> + { "PCA9545", pca_9545 },
> + { "PCA9546", pca_9545 },
> + { "PCA9547", pca_9547 },
> + { "PCA9548", pca_9548 },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, pca954x_acpi_ids);
This table should be #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI.
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> static const struct of_device_id pca954x_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "nxp,pca9540", .data = &chips[pca_9540] },
> @@ -245,8 +259,16 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(pca954x_of_match), &client->dev);
> if (match)
> data->chip = of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
> - else
> + else if (id) {
> data->chip = &chips[id->driver_data];
> + } else {
> + const struct acpi_device_id *id;
Please don't shadow the outer id variable.
Cheers,
Peter
> +
> + id = acpi_match_device(pca954x_acpi_ids, &client->dev);
> + if (!id)
> + return -ENODEV;
> + data->chip = &chips[id->driver_data];
> + }
>
> data->last_chan = 0; /* force the first selection */
>
> @@ -321,6 +343,7 @@ static int pca954x_resume(struct device *dev)
> .name = "pca954x",
> .pm = &pca954x_pm,
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(pca954x_of_match),
> + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(pca954x_acpi_ids),
> },
> .probe = pca954x_probe,
> .remove = pca954x_remove,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
