Hi Wolfram, On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I think postponing merge of patches is one thing but I don't think >> dropping them forever is a long term solution. I think we should have > > Just to make sure because you wrote 'them': I talked about one patch of > the series, not the whole series, namely DVFS. Because Lager is the only > board we have where you can multiplex DVFS between IIC and I2C, no GPIO > option here. All other SoCs have dedicated pins for DVFS which you can't > mux to anything else at all. Sorry I meant "one patch". As a workaround it is fine, but dropping one patch still does not change the way the hardware is designed. Being able to change the I2C master controller between the on-chip I2C device and the on-chip IIC device is still something that the hardware supports but we cannot seem to do without further software development. Thanks, / magnus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
