On 10/14/2016 6:30 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:52:50PM +0100, Luis.Oliveira@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> - is_slave = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "isslave"); > Which tree is this based on? I cant see the existing isslave property in > mainline HEAD (commit 29fbff8698fc0ac1). I'm replying for Luís, since at the moment he's not able to reply. This is a custom property since this I2C core doesn't support both master and slave at the same time. > >> +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI >> + is_slave = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "is-slave"); >> +#endif > This ifdef is broken. At least for arm64, a single kernel image can be > booted with either ACPI or DT. We need separate accessors for DT and > ACPI to handle these differently, or you need to explicitly check > whether or not you have ACPI or DT at runtime. Thanks for the feedback, I'll take a look at this > > Thanks, > Mark. Thanks, Ramiro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
