Noralf Trønnes <noralf@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Support a dynamic clock by reading the frequency and setting the > divisor in the transfer function instead of during probe. Is this fixing some particular case you could note in the commit message? As is, it makes me think that we should be using a notifier for when the parent clock (that's the one I assume you're talking about being dynamic) changes. But maybe you're working around a variable VPU clock being set by the firmware, because we don't have a notifier for it? I'm a bit worried because I think this is going to be pretty expensive to be doing per transfer.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
