> I did state some reasons previously. Consistent rules for submitters > of DT bindings and being able to trace history beyond git. Now, I > guess you aren't changing the rules, but you probably aren't > requesting people to split DT bindings either? You might not be aware, > but we also generate a DT only tree with git-filter-branch[1] for > non-kernel projects to use bindings and dts files. For that, sure they > will only get the DT binding part of it, but what commit text do they > get? Finally, DT maintainer acks (which from me is a review really) > apply to the bindings only. Sometimes I review the drivers, but not > often. So I would like the git history of my reviews to be accurate in > terms of what I actually reviewed. Points taken. Will keep them seperate from now on. Thanks, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
