On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:34:31PM -0700, Stefan Agner wrote: >> Yeah it is a bit a wording thing: In my understanding, pinctrl is >> required on SoC's witch have a pin controller... It is just that the >> driver does not need to get the pinctrl by itself because the stack is >> taking care of it implicitly. And yes, that makes the particular example >> not a real world example. > > At first I thought, too, that it's a fatal problem if getting the > pinctrl stuff fails. IMHO that shows that the comments (or the code) are > still not good enough. Ya. If it has confused more than one people, it is likely to confuse more. I agree with you that we should make it more clear. Thanks, Leo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
