On 2016-08-23 23:16, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:17:57AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> This makes it trivial to constify them, so do that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Looks good. Could you rebase to i2c/for-next? Right, no problem! Cheers, Peter The following changes since commit 00f0ea70d2b82b7d7afeb1bdedc9169eb8ea6675: eeprom: at24: check if the chip is functional in probe() (2016-08-22 08:19:58 +0200) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/peda-r/i2c-mux.git i2c-lock-op for you to fetch changes up to 4b42b8c2e3233671e49deee71458edb6737a38bf: i2c: move locking operations to their own struct (2016-08-24 06:38:58 +0200) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Rosin (2): i2c: add i2c_trylock_bus wrapper, use it i2c: move locking operations to their own struct drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 15 +++++++++------ drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++----------- include/linux/i2c.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
