On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:21:00PM -0800, David E. Box wrote: > Hi > > Sorry I missed this discussion. I believe the following code in > i2c_dw_eval_lock_support() should make it so that it doesn't matter how > IOSF_MBI is built: > > if (!iosf_mbi_available()) > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > I added this to address i2c_designware probing before iosf_mbi. It worked but > I do not recall if IOSF_MBI=m was the problem scenario. If so you can just > change it to: > > depends in I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM && IOSF_MBI > > Give me a few days to confirm on my Baytrail device. What is the status here?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
