Re: [PATCH v6 00/24] i2c mux cleanup and locking update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> can obviously take forever. At the same time, many of the patches are kind
> of mechanical, and feels rather safe.

I agree about the mechanical stuff, thus my suggestion. We do what we
can about testing and reviewing. And once it reaches linux-next
(hopefully next week latest), test coverage will increase significantly
and we can fix issues incrementally from there on. Same goes when it
finally hits Linus' tree, coverage will increase more, but we should be
really at a very sane level then ;)

I will  also pick up patch 15 (the removal) for 4.8. So we have the full
4.7 cycle to revert if something goes very wrong.

> Maybe we should give Antti some more time to re-add his tested-by tags
> on 9-12 before they are merged into non-rewritable branches?

Yes. That would be great. I need to sync with the media maintainers
anyhow. I'd like to push all the patches via my tree.

Thanks,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux