On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 13:39 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Sorry for the late reaction, but... > > On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 12:45:42 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 12:35 +0100, Christian Fetzer wrote: > > (...) > > > @@ -129,10 +133,12 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id > > > piix4_dmi_ibm[] = { > > > }; > > > > > > /* SB800 globals */ > > > +DEFINE_MUTEX(piix4_mutex_sb800); > > > > Same question as for patch 3. > > Noooooo! Calm down, it was only a question. I don't know why the author chose the way that is in upstream. Good you have explained this here. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html