Hi Wolfram, On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:19:35 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:05:01PM +0200, Christian Fetzer wrote: > > This is an attempt to upstream the patches created by Thomas Brandon and > > Eddi De Pieri to support the multiplexed main SMBus interface on the SB800 > > chipset. (https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg06757.html) > > > > I have mainly rebased the latest patch version and tested the driver on a > > HP ProLiant MicroServer G7 N54L (where this patch allows to access sensor data > > from a w83795adg). > > > > The patched driver is running stable on the machine, given that ic2_piix4 is > > loaded before jc42 and w83795. If jc42 is loaded before i2c_piix4 calling > > sensors triggers some errors: > > ERROR: Can't get value of subfeature temp1_min_alarm: Can't read > > > > While the kernel log shows: > > i2c i2c-1: Transaction (pre): CNT=0c, CMD=05, ADD=31, DAT0=03, DAT1=c0 > > i2c i2c-1: Error: no response! > > i2c i2c-1: Transaction (post): CNT=0c, CMD=05, ADD=31, DAT0=ff, DAT1=ff > > Unfortunately I don't know how to tackle this specific issue. > > > > Please review and let me know required changes in order to get this upstream > > finally. > > > > Eddi, Thomas, it would be great if you could verify the changes on your > > machines. > > Yes, additional tests are always good for a patch series > > Asking the Intel guys for help, I have not much expierence with x86 > platforms... Mika, Jarkko, Andy any chance to help? JFYI... The i2c-piix4 driver was originally for Intel hardware, however for many many years now Intel has moved to i2c-i801 and the only recent hardware supported by the i2c-piix4 driver is from AMD. So if you want to bother a hardware vendor with this driver, that should be AMD, not Intel. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
