Hi Andy,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:22:28PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 20:49 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > I'm okay with the original patch putting some "sane" initial value.
> > It can be modified at runtime via a i2c-dev ioctl if needed.
>
> Ah, good. So, I'm fine with it if no one has strong argument.
So can you give your ack to the original patch then?
Thanks,
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
