On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 12:54 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/14, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:31 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 10/14, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > > > From: Hou Zhiqiang <B48286@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <B48286@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > Could you ack my clock patchset that this depends on (if there are no > > > > objections)? Mike Turquette acked the RFC version a while back, but it's > > > > changed a bit since then (including the new clk_get_num_parents() and > > > > clk_get_parent_by_index() -- I CCed Russell King on that but got no > > > > response), and got no response when I asked whether the ack was still good > > > > for v3. > > > > > > Done. The consumer APIs look ok too, but I'd like to see if > Russell has any comments. I've pinged Russell several times and gotten no response -- how should we proceed? -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
