On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 22:57 -0800, Loc Ho wrote: > >> Sure you want this? > > Yes. Even though it may look like too much macros for just several > > devices now. But I think AMD and other ARM socs may also try to leverage > > APD for more and more ACPI devices. > > It is a good direction that 1)improve efficiency of matching ACPI > > handler 2) split devices and potential hook routines into different > > classes clearly > > > > It also will be more convenient to move ARM devices out of APD if there > > is a new design for ARM ACPI device. > > > > Okay... I will generate v2 when ready. One more question, does AMD > ARM64 SoC need it later? > Thanks. I am not sure about driver design for AMD ARM64 SoC. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
