On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c > @@ -211,12 +214,12 @@ static int rcar_i2c_clock_calculate(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv, struct i2c_timin > * it is impossible to calculate large scale > * number on u32. separate it > * > - * F[(ticf + tr + intd) * ick] > - * = F[(35 + 200 + 50)ns * ick] > - * = F[285 * ick / 1000000000] > - * = F[(ick / 1000000) * 285 / 1000] > + * F[(ticf + tr + intd) * ick] with sum = (ticf + tr + intd) > + * = F[sum * ick / 1000000000] > + * = F[(ick / 1000000) * sum / 1000] > */ > - round = (ick + 500000) / 1000000 * 285; > + sum = t->scl_fall_ns + t->scl_rise_ns + t->scl_int_delay_ns; > + round = (ick + 500000) / 1000000 * sum; If you're sure it cannot overflow, doing the "* sum" before the division improves accuracy. > round = (round + 500) / 1000; You can use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST everywhere, e.g. round = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(round, 1000) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html