Hi Aaron, On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:25:11 -0600 (CST), Aaron Sierra wrote: > Previously, the at24 driver would bail out in the case of a 16-bit > addressable EEPROM attached to an SMBus controller. This is because > SMBus block reads and writes don't map to I2C multi-byte reads and > writes when the offset portion is 2 bytes. > > Instead of bailing out, this patch settles for functioning with single > byte read SMBus cycles. Writes can be block or single-byte, depending > on SMBus controller features. > > Read access is not without some risk. Multiple SMBus cycles are > required to read even one byte. If the SMBus has multiple masters and > one accesses this EEPROM between the dummy address write and the > subsequent current-address-read cycle(s), this driver will receive > data from the wrong address. > > Functionality has been tested with the following devices: > > AT24CM01 attached to Intel ISCH SMBus > AT24C512 attached to Intel I801 SMBus > > Read performance: > 3.6 KB/s with 32-byte* access > > *limited to 32-bytes by I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX. > > Write performance: > 248 B/s with 1-byte page (default) > 3.9 KB/s with 128-byte* page (via platform data) > > *limited to 31-bytes by I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX - 1. > > Signed-off-by: Nate Case <ncase@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <asierra@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2 - Account for changes related to introduction of > i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data_or_emulated() > v3 - Consolidate three patches into one > - Expand comments regarding SMBus multi-master read risks. > - Rely on current-address-read for improved read performance (i.e. one > dummy address write followed by multiple individual byte reads). > This improves performance from 1.4 KiB/s to 3.6 KiB/s. > - Use struct at24_data's writebuf instead of kzalloc-ing > - Only limit write_max by 1-byte when accessing a 16-bit device with > block writes instead of attempting to preserve a power-of-two. > - Style fixes (indentation, parentheses, unnecessary masking, etc.) > v4 - Address 16-bit safety in Kconfig > - Set "count" to zero later in at24_smbus_read_block_data() > - Fix over-80-columns issues in at24_eeprom_read() > - Fix write_max off-by-one in at24_probe() > - Check SMBus functionality needed for 16-bit device reads > - Homogenize indentation of SMBus functionality checks for SMBus write > > drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig | 5 +- > drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) This is a significant addition of code so feel free to add your name at the top of at24.c. We're almost there: > diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c > index 5d7c090..3dfd2ed 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c > (...) > @@ -527,10 +608,19 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) > > /* Use I2C operations unless we're stuck with SMBus extensions. */ > if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) { > - if (chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) > - return -EPFNOSUPPORT; > - > - if (i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, > + if ((chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) && > + i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, > + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BYTE_DATA | > + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_BYTE_DATA)) { It is I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BYTE that you use, not I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BYTE_DATA. > + /* > + * We need SMBUS_WRITE_BYTE_DATA and > + * SMBUS_READ_BYTE_DATA to implement byte reads for > + * 16-bit address devices. This will be slow, but > + * better than nothing (e.g. read @ 3.6 KiB/s). It is > + * also unsafe in a multi-master topology. > + */ > + use_smbus = I2C_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA; > + } else if (i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, > I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK)) { > use_smbus = I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA; > } else if (i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, > (...) > @@ -598,8 +698,9 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) > > if (write_max > io_limit) > write_max = io_limit; > - if (use_smbus && write_max > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX) > - write_max = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX; > + if (use_smbus && write_max >= I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX) > + write_max = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX - > + !!(chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16); Beh. OK, it works, I will admit it's even kind of clever, but it also looks fragile and confusing to some degree. What is wrong with just spelling out the condition explicitly? unsigned smbus_limit = (chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) ? I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX - 1 : I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX; if (use_smbus && write_max > smbus_limit) write_max = smbus_limit; This might not even be slower, and IMHO it is easier to understand. > at24->write_max = write_max; > > /* buffer (data + address at the beginning) */ I have no objection to this patch being merged into the upstream kernel, but ultimately this is Wolfram's call. Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html