>>>>> "Bartosz" == Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Hi, >> > I wanted to respond that this way we would not be protected from >> > concurrent accesses, but then I saw I didn't actually include any >> > locks in the serial read function - my bad. It needs to be fixed as >> > both memory blocks share the same address pointer. >> >> > I'll resend the series. >> >> But we're protected by the i2c bus lock, right? You do a single >> i2c_transfer to read the serial number. > Why the at24->lock then? I'm not sure. Wolfram? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
