On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 20:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:37:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 08:29:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:57:50PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > I can't see adding calls like this all over the tree just to solve a > > > > bus-specific problem, you are adding of_* calls where they aren't > > > > needed, or wanted, at all. > > > > This isn't bus specific, I'm not sure what makes you say that? > > > You are making it bus-specific by putting these calls all over the tree > > in different bus subsystems semi-randomly for all I can determine. > > Do you mean firmware rather than bus here? I think that's the confusion > I have... Certainly, if it literally is adding of_* calls then that would seem to be gratuitously firmware-specific. Nothing should be using those these days; any new code should be using the generic device property APIs (except in special cases). -- dwmw2
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
