The first part of the comment is wrong since November 2007, delete it.
The second part of the comment is related to I2C_PEC, not I2C_SLAVE, so
move it where it belongs.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c | 17 +++++++----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- linux-4.2.orig/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c 2015-09-11 11:22:00.962436523 +0200
+++ linux-4.2/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c 2015-09-11 11:22:22.532879192 +0200
@@ -421,16 +421,6 @@ static long i2cdev_ioctl(struct file *fi
switch (cmd) {
case I2C_SLAVE:
case I2C_SLAVE_FORCE:
- /* NOTE: devices set up to work with "new style" drivers
- * can't use I2C_SLAVE, even when the device node is not
- * bound to a driver. Only I2C_SLAVE_FORCE will work.
- *
- * Setting the PEC flag here won't affect kernel drivers,
- * which will be using the i2c_client node registered with
- * the driver model core. Likewise, when that client has
- * the PEC flag already set, the i2c-dev driver won't see
- * (or use) this setting.
- */
if ((arg > 0x3ff) ||
(((client->flags & I2C_M_TEN) == 0) && arg > 0x7f))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -446,6 +436,13 @@ static long i2cdev_ioctl(struct file *fi
client->flags &= ~I2C_M_TEN;
return 0;
case I2C_PEC:
+ /*
+ * Setting the PEC flag here won't affect kernel drivers,
+ * which will be using the i2c_client node registered with
+ * the driver model core. Likewise, when that client has
+ * the PEC flag already set, the i2c-dev driver won't see
+ * (or use) this setting.
+ */
if (arg)
client->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_PEC;
else
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
