> It's true that this is something that we might have overlooked. Is it
> expected to maintain that compatibility when moving a driver from one
> framework to another (and this is a real question, not a troll)?
Yes. There will be user space applications reading from the eeprom
file in /sys. In fact, until the NVMEM framework arrived, it was not
easy to access the eeprom from kernel space, meaning the majority of
users must of been user space...
> If so, we might provide a compatibility layer to add the former file
> too, protected by a kconfig option maybe ?
There is one other detail you might of missed. Both AT24 and AT25 do
have an in kernel API. In the at24_platform_data you can have a
callback function "setup" which gets called when the device is
probed. setup() is called with a struct memory_accessor which contains
function pointers for reading and writing to the EEPROM. A few
platforms use these for getting the MAC address out of the EEPROM.
And these platforms are old style, not DT.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
