From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The current naming is based on the arguments of the functions and not on
what they do. Even I as the maintainer find this confusing, so let's
rename them to something more descriptive.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index a807e272e1fc2e..b54a0f092d53f6 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ static unsigned short i2c_encode_flags_to_addr(struct i2c_client *client)
/* This is a permissive address validity check, I2C address map constraints
* are purposely not enforced, except for the general call address. */
-static int i2c_check_client_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client)
+static int i2c_check_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client)
{
if (client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN) {
/* 10-bit address, all values are valid */
@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int i2c_check_client_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client)
* device uses a reserved address, then it shouldn't be probed. 7-bit
* addressing is assumed, 10-bit address devices are rare and should be
* explicitly enumerated. */
-static int i2c_check_addr_validity(unsigned short addr)
+static int i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(unsigned short addr)
{
/*
* Reserved addresses per I2C specification:
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ i2c_new_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_board_info const *info)
strlcpy(client->name, info->type, sizeof(client->name));
/* Check for address validity */
- status = i2c_check_client_addr_validity(client);
+ status = i2c_check_addr_validity(client);
if (status) {
dev_err(&adap->dev, "Invalid %d-bit I2C address 0x%02hx\n",
client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN ? 10 : 7, client->addr);
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ static int i2c_detect_address(struct i2c_client *temp_client,
int err;
/* Make sure the address is valid */
- err = i2c_check_addr_validity(addr);
+ err = i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(addr);
if (err) {
dev_warn(&adapter->dev, "Invalid probe address 0x%02x\n",
addr);
@@ -2382,7 +2382,7 @@ i2c_new_probed_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
for (i = 0; addr_list[i] != I2C_CLIENT_END; i++) {
/* Check address validity */
- if (i2c_check_addr_validity(addr_list[i]) < 0) {
+ if (i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(addr_list[i]) < 0) {
dev_warn(&adap->dev, "Invalid 7-bit address "
"0x%02x\n", addr_list[i]);
continue;
@@ -2957,7 +2957,7 @@ int i2c_slave_register(struct i2c_client *client, i2c_slave_cb_t slave_cb)
if (!(client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN)) {
/* Enforce stricter address checking */
- ret = i2c_check_addr_validity(client->addr);
+ ret = i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(client->addr);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: invalid address\n", __func__);
return ret;
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
