On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Ellen Wang wrote: > >> When doing an I2C_SMBUS_BYTE write (one byte write, no address), >> the data to be written is in "command" not "data->byte". >> >> Signed-off-by: Ellen Wang <ellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Forgot signed-off-by tag last time, sorry. > > Applied to for-4.3/cp2112. > > On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Wow, that driver seems to be largely untested. Thanks for cleaning it >> up! Sidenote: i2c drivers should really be in drivers/i2c ;) > > Well, it's sometimes a bit on the borderline where HID drivers should live > (because they often, in addition to HID layer, make use of some other > transport). If you want to move it under your wings, please send a patch > that moves it and I'll Ack it. This is a MFD; should be split in GPIO and I2C, then each part moved in its respective tree. Anyone already working in this direction? Regards, Antonio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
