On Thursday 09 July 2015 02:06 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/30/2015 04:54 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Bandi <bandik@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'm not sure why Chaitanya's S-o-b is there and listed last if he's
not the patch author. If he wrote the patch, he should be the git
author and his S-o-b should be first. If he didn't and you simply
based this patch on work by Chaitanya, then his S-o-b probably
shouldn't be present, and yours would be last since you're submitting
the patch.
The patch I created is based on Chaitanya's work, edited on his work to
match with mainline.
---
Stephen/Andrew,
I need help on testing this on other platform. I tested this on T210.
I'm puzzled how this was tested on T210, since it isn't supported
upstream yet.
We tested this as:
- K318 kernel release + i2c subsystem from linux-next in downstream boards.
- Chrome-OS team on smaug with their tree.
The series,
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for testing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
