On Friday 03 July 2015 08:58 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:#define _IBMR(i2c) ((i2c)->reg_ibmr) @@ -286,6 +287,22 @@ static void i2c_pxa_scream_blue_murder(struct pxa_i2c *i2c, const char *why) static void i2c_pxa_master_complete(struct pxa_i2c *i2c, int ret); static irqreturn_t i2c_pxa_handler(int this_irq, void *dev_id); +/* enable/disable i2c unit */ +static inline int i2c_pxa_is_enabled(struct pxa_i2c *i2c) +{ + return (readl(_ICR(i2c)) & ICR_IUE); +} + +static inline void i2c_pxa_enable(struct pxa_i2c *i2c, bool enable) +{ + if (enable && !i2c_pxa_is_enabled(i2c)) { + writel(readl(_ICR(i2c)) | ICR_IUE, _ICR(i2c)); + udelay(100); + } else { + writel(readl(_ICR(i2c)) & ~ICR_IUE, _ICR(i2c)); + } +} + static inline int i2c_pxa_is_slavemode(struct pxa_i2c *i2c) { return !(readl(_ICR(i2c)) & ICR_SCLE); @@ -482,8 +499,7 @@ static void i2c_pxa_reset(struct pxa_i2c *i2c) i2c_pxa_set_slave(i2c, 0); /* enable unit */ - writel(readl(_ICR(i2c)) | ICR_IUE, _ICR(i2c)); - udelay(100); + i2c_pxa_enable(i2c, true); } @@ -840,6 +856,9 @@ static int i2c_pxa_pio_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct pxa_i2c *i2c = adap->algo_data; int ret, i; + /* Enable i2c unit */ + i2c_pxa_enable(i2c, true); + /* If the I2C controller is disabled we need to reset it (probably due to a suspend/resume destroying state). We do this here as we can then avoid worrying about resuming the @@ -860,6 +879,11 @@ static int i2c_pxa_pio_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, ret = -EREMOTEIO; out: i2c_pxa_set_slave(i2c, ret); + + /* disable i2c unit */ + if (i2c->disable_after_xfer) + i2c_pxa_enable(i2c, false); + return ret; } @@ -1075,6 +1099,9 @@ static int i2c_pxa_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num struct pxa_i2c *i2c = adap->algo_data; int ret, i; + /* Enable i2c unit */ + i2c_pxa_enable(i2c, true);Okay, what happens in master mode when we get there on the 2nd xfer : - i2c is enabled AFAIU. - as a consequence i2c_pxa_is_enabled() returns true - as a consequence, i2c_pxa_enable() _disables_ the i2c, right ? - as a consequence i2c is broken Is this correct, because if it is the patch needs a rework ?
Good catch :) I will fix this in next version. Thanks, Vaibhav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
