On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:39:22PM +0300, Robert Dolca wrote: > Currently, if the name used for DT (in dts) matches one of the names > specified in the id table you will have a match. Isn't that an > intended behavior? I thought one needs to put IDs to the driver .of_match_table. This is also what i2c_device_match() is expecting, if I read it right. BTW, how modules are supposed to be matched if we allow putting ACPI identifiers to i2c_device_id table? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
