> Does the framework check for the slave support flag before binding a > slave to the controler? I assume that not, but wonder if it should. I think this nails it: Currently, the core doesn't use any I2C_FUNC_* flags for checking anything. It is solely for exposing information to users. I'd like to have FUNC_SLAVE in line with that for now. If we are going to change that, it should be a seperate thread and not limited to FUNC_SLAVE. I might note that for me this is not a priority issue, so don't expect patches from me ;)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
