On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 07:51:44PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > For, !HAVE_CLK the clk API returns a NULL cookie. Rework the > > initialization code to handle that. If clk_get_rate() delivers 0, we use > > the fallback mechanisms. The patch is pretty easy when ignoring white > > space issues (git diff -b). > > > > Suggested-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Max, can you please test/review. I can only compile-test. This is the outcome > > of this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/5/544 > > I've tested it with and without HAVE_CLK, both work well for me. Great, thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
