On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:34:01PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > On 02/03/2015 07:53 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >If latter a better way to lock the I2C mux appears, we can reverse > >this change. > More I am worried about next patch in a serie, which converts all that to > regmap API... Same recursive mux register access comes to problem there, > which I work-arounded by defining own I2C IO... And in that case I used > i2c_lock_adapter/i2c_unlock_adapter so adapter is locked properly. Opne coding the register I/O is a terrible solution, we should allow people to keep this code factored out.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
