On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 05:49:34PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > IOSF_MBI depends on PCI, so we should not select it but depend on it. > This ensures also we compile on X86 only, other archs will break because > of an arch specific include. Also depend on ACPI since this driver uses > it. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Depending on IOSF_MBI also helps against the I2C driver being built-in and IOSF_MBI being a module. > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > index 83062b2c0e6b..442408d2e7b7 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > @@ -467,8 +467,7 @@ config I2C_DESIGNWARE_PCI > > config I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL > bool "Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support" > - depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM > - select IOSF_MBI > + depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM && IOSF_MBI && ACPI > help > This driver enables managed host access to the PMIC I2C bus on select > Intel BayTrail platforms using the X-Powers AXP288 PMIC. It allows > -- > 2.1.3 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature