On 1/15/2015 3:59 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>>> + case M_CMD_STATUS_LOST_ARB: >>>> + dev_err(dev->device, "lost bus arbitration\n"); >>> I wouldn't dev_err that, only dev_dbg. I'm not sure how usual the errors >>> for the next two cases is, maybe degrade them to dev_dbg, too? >>> >> These errors are rare, and it's nice to keep them at the dev_err level >> so the user will be more aware. > > This is wrong. Arbitration lost and NACK is pretty standard stuff on an > I2C bus. User doesn't need to know about it, it is just noise in the > logs. Timeout is different, you can report that (although I should > probably move such a message into the core). Please also use the proper > errno codes defined in Documentation/i2c/fault-codes. They should be > distinct enough to drop the messages. > Okay will do. >> >>>> + return -EREMOTEIO; >>>> + >>>> + case M_CMD_STATUS_NACK_ADDR: >>>> + dev_err(dev->device, "NAK addr:0x%02x\n", dev->msg->addr); >>>> + return -EREMOTEIO; >>>> + >>>> + case M_CMD_STATUS_NACK_DATA: >>>> + dev_err(dev->device, "NAK data\n"); >>>> + return -EREMOTEIO; >>>> + >>>> + case M_CMD_STATUS_TIMEOUT: >>>> + dev_err(dev->device, "bus timeout\n"); >>>> + return -ETIMEDOUT; >>>> + >>>> + default: >>>> + dev_err(dev->device, "unknown error code=%d\n", val); >>>> + return -EREMOTEIO; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + return -EREMOTEIO; >>>> +} -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
