Re: [PATCH 1/4] i2c: iProc: define Broadcom iProc I2C binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/9/2014 7:12 PM, Varka Bhadram wrote:


On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Ray Jui <rjui@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:rjui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:



    On 12/9/2014 5:27 PM, Varka Bhadram wrote:

        Hi,

        On Wednesday 10 December 2014 06:24 AM, Ray Jui wrote:

            Document the I2C device tree binding for Broadcom iProc
            family of
            SoCs

            Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@xxxxxxxxxxxx
            <mailto:rjui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
            Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@xxxxxxxxxxxx
            <mailto:sbranden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
            ---
               .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/__brcm,iproc-i2c.txt     |   37
            ++++++++++++++++++++
               1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
               create mode 100644
            Documentation/devicetree/__bindings/i2c/brcm,iproc-i2c.__txt

            diff --git
            a/Documentation/devicetree/__bindings/i2c/brcm,iproc-i2c.__txt
            b/Documentation/devicetree/__bindings/i2c/brcm,iproc-i2c.__txt
            new file mode 100644
            index 0000000..81f982c
            --- /dev/null
            +++
            b/Documentation/devicetree/__bindings/i2c/brcm,iproc-i2c.__txt
            @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
            +Broadcom iProc I2C controller
            +
            +Required properties:
            +
            +- compatible:
            +    Must be "brcm,iproc-i2c"
            +
            +- reg:
            +    Define the base and range of the I/O address space that
            contain
            the iProc
            +    I2C controller registers
            +
            +- interrupts:
            +    Should contain the I2C interrupt
            +
            +- clock-frequency:
            +    This is the I2C bus clock. Need to be either 100000 or
            400000
            +
            +- #address-cells:
            +    Always 1 (for I2C addresses)
            +
            +- #size-cells:
            +    Always 0
            +


        All the properties defined with two lines of statements.

        Why cant they be with single line statement, like:

        compatible:    Must be "brcm,iproc-i2c"
        reg:        Define the base and range of the I/O address space that
                  contain the iProc I2C controller registers

        ....


    I thought making them two lines are more readable (and obviously
    that's very subjective, :)). But more importantly, it matches the
    format of other Broadcom iProc/Cygnus devicetree binding documents
    that are currently in progress of upstreaming.


But max of the bindings over the kernel follows single line statements.

--
Thanks and Regards,
Varka Bhadram.
Is it a requirement for these property descriptions to be one line? If not, I prefer to stick with the way it is now. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux