* Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@xxxxxxxxx> [141128 15:27]: > Hello, Tony! > > I just want to know, is multimaster i2c feature is interesting for TI SOC, > so I could send another patches? Sure and thanks for looking into fixing things. > Or it's better to leave the thing without changes, as current single master version > well tested and work? Well once the fixes are in, I don't see any reason to not add multimaster support. > Also I have a draft version of mixed multimaster/slave version. But it could introduce new bugs. > Are we ready for that? Thats because IP behavior, sometimes, doesn't correspond to TRMs[4][5]. > It's the one of strange IP I ever seen on TI SOC. And TRM not as detailed as DSP TRMs. I think we can pretty easily test the i2c support before things get merged. I guess it should then be possible to loop two i2c controllers and run automated tests on them :) > Looks, like you haven't seen my response in another thread[1]. > So, duplicate it here. Sorry I guess I forgot to reply, let me know if I still missed something. I'll give your two fixes a try on Monday hopefully. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html