Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > >I usually don't take DTS patches. They should go via arm-soc. Please say > > >so if there are reasons I should take them. > > > > I CC'ed to you because same patch contains changes in i2c driver. > > Yes, those should absolutely go via my I2C tree. You need to make a > seperate patch out of the dts changes which then also should go via > samsung-soc, unless Kukjin says he really wants to go the via I2C. But I > guess the latter will just create merge conflicts. Hmm...I think, Pankaj needs to submit separated patches 1) driver change, 2) dt change and then 3) remove change. And 2nd and 3rd changes should be handed in Samsung tree together after landing 1) change in -next. Of course, 1) change should be handled in i2c tree ;) Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
