On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:31:04PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> The i2c-i801 driver can work without interrupts, so there is no reason
> to make a request_irq failure fatal. Instead we can simply fallback
> to polling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-3.18-rc4.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c 2014-11-10 22:29:42.788955868 +0100
> +++ linux-3.18-rc4/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c 2014-11-10 22:29:44.416991298 +0100
> @@ -1242,9 +1242,11 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *de
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "Failed to allocate irq %d: %d\n",
> dev->irq, err);
> - goto exit_release;
> + priv->features &= ~FEATURE_IRQ;
> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "SMBus using polling\n");
Shouldn't this message also be printed for !FEATURE_IRQ? I'd think it
should be moved to another place. We can also deduce from the dev_err
above that polling will be used, no?
> + } else {
> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "SMBus using PCI interrupt\n");
> }
> - dev_info(&dev->dev, "SMBus using PCI Interrupt\n");
> }
>
> /* set up the sysfs linkage to our parent device */
> @@ -1272,7 +1274,6 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *de
> exit_free_irq:
> if (priv->features & FEATURE_IRQ)
> free_irq(dev->irq, priv);
> -exit_release:
> pci_release_region(dev, SMBBAR);
> exit:
> kfree(priv);
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
> SUSE L3 Support
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
