Hi, On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:32:59PM -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote: > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-img-scb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-img-scb.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > > +IMG Serial Control Bus (SCB) I2C Controller > > + > > +Required Properties: > > +- compatible: "img,scb-i2c" > > Is there no difference between the controller present on TZ1090 and Pistachio? It has a revision register which can be used to determine which revision of the IP block is being driven. For example the fence quirk is only enabled for the revision of the IP in TZ1090. > > +- reg: Physical base address and length of controller registers > > +- interrupts: Interrupt number used by the controller > > +- clocks : Clock specifier to the SCB clock node > > On Pistachio there are two clocks per controller, the I2C operating > clock and I2C "system" clock (which I assume is the system interface > gate clock). TZ1090 also had a system clock like this, so I agree it makes sense to add this, even if the driver does nothing with it yet. Cheers James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
