On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Some GPIO chips (e.g. the DLN2 USB adapter) have blocking get/set > operation but do not need a threaded irq handler. Sorry if you already explained this (I have been a little bit late with the GPIO reviews recently), but does this optimization bring a significant benefit that justifies adding another field in struct gpio_chip? If so it would be nice to have it in the commit message. If not, do we need this at all? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
