On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:27:12PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 22:22 +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/dln2.c b/drivers/mfd/dln2.c
> > []
> > +struct dln2_mod_rx_slots {
> > + /* RX slots bitmap */
> > + unsigned long bmap;
> >
> > Probably better as:
> > DECLARE_BITMAP(bmap, DLN2_MAX_RX_SLOTS);
> >
> > Then a lot of &ptr->bmap uses can be ptr->bmap
> >
>
> Originally I was using DECLARE_BITMAP, but during the review process
> Johan suggested to use unsigned long. Now that I think about it, it
> sounds better to use DECLARE_BITMAP and of couse keep using
> find_first_bit, set_bit, etc. Johan do you see any issue with that?
No, that's fine as long as you keep the bitops.
> >> +struct dln2_dev {
> >> + struct usb_device *usb_dev;
> >> + struct usb_interface *interface;
> >> + u8 ep_in;
> >> + u8 ep_out;
> >> +
> >> + struct urb *rx_urb[DLN2_MAX_URBS];
> >> + void *rx_buf[DLN2_MAX_URBS];
> >> +
> >> + struct dln2_mod_rx_slots mod_rx_slots[DLN2_HANDLES];
> >> +
> >> + struct list_head event_cb_list;
> >> + spinlock_t event_cb_lock;
> >> +
> >> + bool disconnect;
> >> + int active_transfers;
> >> + wait_queue_head_t disconnect_wq;
> >> + spinlock_t disconnect_lock;
> >> +};
> >
> > Maybe reorder the bools and u8s to pack this a bit better?
>
> I prefer to keep it this way, it's not wasting a lot since you will
> only have a handful of these devices, and it keeps the related data
> together.
I agree.
Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
