On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:20:06PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > In <https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/10/265> pointed out that the 10-bit > flag in the cros_ec_tunnel was useless. It went into a 16-bit flags > field but was defined at (1 << 16). > > Since we have no 10-bit i2c devices on the other side of the tunnel on > any known devices this was never a problem. Until we do it makes > sense to remove this code. On the EC side the code to handle this > flag was removed in <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/204162>. > > Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Note that this patch is based atop my current series of posts to > cleanup cros_ec. It wouldn't be hard to apply it to the current ToT > if someone wants to land this before the others. I could take it into my tree, but I think it makes more sense if we simply append it to your cleanup series? Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
