On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:20:16 -0700, Dan Malek <dan.malek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jun 25, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> +int of_transaction_commit(struct of_transaction *oft); > >> > >> How about of_transaction_apply()? > >> > > > > Sure. > > LOL! Panto, you give in too easily :) > > Any transaction state diagrams I've seen always have a "commit" phase/state, never anything called "apply." So, of_transaction_commit() is exactly the proper name. Hahaha. my suggestiong on name is conditional on my earlier comment to make the API bulk-change instead of transaction oriented. Commit is indeed the right name for a transactional model. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
