On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:54:06AM -0600, Bastian Hecht wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > oh yes I can gladly do so. To make a realistic estimation it might > take a few weeks until I find time for it though. If we can wait so > long, count on me. Ping. Still interested? > > Best, > > Bastian > > 2013/2/21 Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Hi Bastian, > > > >> > Also, do you know the reason why this isn't handled in the i2c layer > >> > by default? I ask because your comment mentions that i2c-tegra.c does > >> > the same thing and I can't see anything in this patch that is actually > >> > related to our I2C hardware. > >> > >> Yes, many drivers have a similar scheme and to me it more looked like > >> all drivers need to take care about this case unrelated to different > >> hardware. So the question arises if this can't be handled in the core > >> - or if I get something wrong here. > > > > I don't see any reason why this couldn't be handled in the core. If you > > want to have a take on this issue (after the other bug is fixed), this > > will be highly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Wolfram > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
